The Inside Track: People, Ideas, & Stories shaping how we work, live, and build the future.

Good morning - Michael here, writing from the frontlines of Massif & Kroo: Here's what you need to pay attention to in media today:

That's the number of minutes audiences spent watching long-form creator shows across platforms last year, according to Digiday. Fifty-two billion minutes. To put that in perspective, that is more viewing time than most cable networks generate in a year.

And Spotter used its March 4 showcase to make the pitch explicit: this is premium, episodic, TV-grade inventory, and it should be bought and sold as such. The pitch is correct. The market has not caught up.

Here's where the money actually sits right now.

It does not come out of the television budget. It does not come out of the brand's upfront allocation. It does not sit in the same spreadsheet as the NBC prime-time buy or the Hulu mid-roll placement.

That is a classification problem, not a quality problem. The content is consumed on the largest screen in the house. The episodes run 20 to 60 minutes. The production quality matches or exceeds a lot of what airs on cable. The audience retention is often better than ad-supported streaming. But the media buyer still categorizes it as "creator" or "influencer" — and that classification determines the budget pool it draws from, the CPMs it commands, and the strategic weight it carries inside the brand.

The result is a market where the consumption looks like television, the audience behavior looks like television, the screen looks like television — but the pricing looks like social media. That gap between consumption reality and budget classification is the single biggest mispricing in media advertising right now.

Why hasn't it corrected? Three reasons.

First, organizational structure. Most large brands and agencies have separate teams for television, digital, social, and influencer. Each team controls its own budget. Moving creator content from the influencer team's budget to the television team's budget is not a strategic decision — it is an internal political fight. Someone loses headcount. Someone loses control. The classification persists not because it is accurate but because changing it is bureaucratically expensive.

Second, measurement fragmentation. Television buyers are used to Nielsen panels, guaranteed ratings, and makegoods. Creator content measurement runs through YouTube analytics, third-party platforms, and self-reported creator data. Until the measurement systems converge — or until buyers accept platform-native metrics as equivalent — the TV side of the house has a structural excuse not to engage.

Third, legacy perception. There is still a cohort of senior media buyers who associate "creator" with "influencer" and "influencer" with "unscripted selfie content." That perception is years out of date, but it persists in the rooms where upfront budgets get allocated. The people spending the television money have often never watched the creator content that is outperforming their cable buys.

The creators and intermediaries who are positioned for that reclassification will capture the margin expansion. The ones who are not will watch it happen from the influencer table.

For creators, the strategic imperative is to build for the reclassification now. That means producing content that a television buyer can justify purchasing: consistent cadence, predictable audience, brand-safe environment, high retention, and a format that fits a media plan, not just a campaign brief. The creators who can present their inventory in television terms — reach, frequency, audience composition, completion rates — will be the ones who cross into the TV budget first.

For SMBs, the opportunity is more immediate. Right now, you can buy creator inventory that performs like television at influencer prices. That arbitrage exists because of the classification problem described above. It will not exist forever. The brands that are buying long-form creator integrations today are getting TV-quality reach at a fraction of the TV-market rate. When the reclassification happens, that discount disappears.

The bigger picture: this is not just a media-buying story. It is a story about where value accrues in the content economy. The traditional television value chain — studio produces, network distributes, advertiser buys — is being compressed into a single creator who produces, distributes, and sells. That compression eliminates layers of cost and intermediation, which means the margins available to creators in a reclassified market are structurally better than the margins available to traditional TV producers. The economics are not converging. They are inverting.

Google says the new non-skip format is "built for the big screen" and designed for "relaxed, living-room" viewing — the exact language a broadcast upfront presentation would use TechSpot. When the platform adopts the ad format, the pricing format follows.

For creators producing long-form content: the 30-second unskippable spot running against your video is a TV ad in everything but budget classification. That gap will close. (Note to reader: if you used this item on Tuesday, swap in the HYBE/Spotify video podcast partnership here instead — same thesis about creator content being treated as premium, TV-grade programming.)

The awards, which include physical plaques, platform editorial features, social spotlights, and an out-of-home campaign in Los Angeles, were given to podcasts reaching specific streaming thresholds. The signal is not the awards themselves. It is that Spotify is building a prestige infrastructure around podcast scale — the same way television built the Emmys to legitimize its programming for advertisers.

For creators: when a platform invests in publicly celebrating its top performers with physical recognition and ad campaigns, it is building a case for budget reclassification. Spotify wants podcast inventory treated like premium media. The milestone system is part of that pitch.

YOUR NEXT MOVE: If you are a creator producing long-form content, build a one-page media kit that speaks television language: average episode length, audience retention rate, completion rate, demographic composition, monthly unique viewers, and brand-safety profile. The next time a brand approaches you for a "partnership," present that sheet and ask which budget it is coming from.

If the answer is influencer, that is fine — but now you have started the conversation about reclassification. If you are an SMB, call your media buyer this week and ask one question: are we buying any creator long-form inventory, and if so, what budget line is it on? The answer will tell you whether you are capturing the arbitrage or missing it.

Thanks for reading! I’ll see you on tomorrow.

Feedback, thoughts, suggestions? Hit the reply!

Michael Wildes is the founder and CEO of Drive Phase Holding Company, a permanent-capital firm focused on building category-defining companies across business, media (owner of Massif & Kroo), aviation, and impact. After leaving a career as a professional pilot, he spent a year as Business Editor at FLYING Magazine writing 330+ articles on aviation's transformation. Now he builds permanent-capital companies focused on long-term trends that compound over decades. Based in Arlington, Virginia.

Connect: mikewildes.com | [email protected]

Massif & Kroo: We go beyond the ‘what’—nuance matters.