Michael here: A bread truck did this.

A May Supreme Court decision, stitched together out of a bread-truck case, gives some of the most overlooked and underpaid people in aviation a way to be heard in court. It is not a labor uprising. For the workers who keep the ramp moving and rarely get noticed, it may be the closest thing to a real voice they have had. Here’s what I mean. 

I have flown into Teterboro in the middle of summer, when the jets stack up and everyone climbing out of them is in a hurry to get to the Hamptons. You notice how the people on the ground get treated. The fuelers, the rampers, the marshallers work fast in the heat while passengers look straight through them. Those are the workers who keep the whole thing moving. If they walk off, nothing flies. They are also, by a wide margin, some of the lowest-paid and least-protected people in this industry, and most travelers never learn their names or think to tip them.

In May, the Supreme Court handed those workers something they have rarely had. The case is Flowers Foods v. Brock, and it had nothing to do with airplanes. It had everything to do with the arbitration clause buried in nearly every aviation hiring packet, the one that keeps wage disputes out of public court. A clarification first, because the initials collide. Here, FAA means the Federal Arbitration Act, a 1925 law about contracts, not the Federal Aviation Administration.

What the ruling did is narrower than the headlines, and it turns on facts. It does not free aviation workers from arbitration. It gives some of them a far stronger argument to get out of it, and whether any one worker qualifies still depends on what that worker actually does all day. The direction is not in doubt. For a large piece of the aviation workforce, a threat that went nowhere a few years ago now has weight behind it. I'll see you in court.

Most workers signed an arbitration clause without reading it. In plain terms, it says that if a legal fight comes up, the worker cannot sue in normal court. The dispute goes to a private arbitrator instead, on rules the company's agreement sets. Private room, not public arena, and companies prefer the private room for reasons that have little to do with who is right.

Court is public. Arbitration is confidential, so payroll practices and internal emails stay buried. Court opens discovery, where each side hands over timecards, schedules, and manager messages, and patterns surface. Arbitration limits it. The biggest reason, though, is that the clause usually stops workers from joining together. A single fueler owed three thousand dollars in overtime may never find a lawyer, because the math fails.

Three hundred fuelers owed the same money is a class action that can cost a company millions. The clause turns one case of 300 into 300 separate cases, fought one at a time. So when it holds, a wage dispute stays small and quiet. When it breaks, the same dispute can go public, pull in other workers, and open the company's books. Brock decides which.

The route it took is almost funny. The thing that may finally give these workers a voice is not a clean new law. It is an old one, from 1925, stitched to two recent cases until it stretched far enough to reach them.

The Federal Arbitration Act carved out one group from forced arbitration: transportation workers engaged in foreign or interstate commerce, meaning goods or people crossing a state line or a border. It was written for the seamen and railroad crews of a century ago.

For aviation, the door opened in 2022, when the Court held in Southwest Airlines v. Saxon that a ramp supervisor who loaded and unloaded cargo was a transportation worker the airline could not force into arbitration, because the test is the work itself, not the label on the employer.

Two years later the Ninth Circuit went further in Lopez v. Aircraft Service International, ruling that a fuel technician at Los Angeles International was exempt, since fueling interstate flights is a direct and necessary part of moving the freight. That one binds only the Ninth Circuit and California.

Brock is the third piece, and it takes away the employer's easiest line.

Angelo Brock drove a bakery route around Denver, picking up bread baked out of state and dropping it at Colorado stores without ever leaving Colorado. Flowers Foods called him a franchisee, pointed to his arbitration clause, and argued that a man who never crossed a state line was not in interstate commerce. A unanimous Court, through Justice Gorsuch, disagreed. The bread was still mid-journey when Brock carried the last few miles. "Nothing in those terms," the Court wrote of the statute, "requires an individual to cross state lines."

Stack the three together and the lesson for aviation is plain. The test is the work, not the geography.

A line tech who fuels and loads a Gulfstream bound from Teterboro to Dallas is doing interstate transport work, even if his boots never leave the ramp.

Aviation forgets these people. We picture pilots and flight attendants, and rarely the fueler or the cargo loader, and the gap shows up in their protection. Pilots have unions. Flight attendants have unions. Ramp workers at the major airlines have unions. The people who do the same work for a contractor, a regional, or an FBO mostly do not, and that is exactly where this ruling lands.

The numbers tell the story. Across the private sector, only 5.9 percent of workers belonged to a union in 2025, the lowest figure on record. Transportation and warehousing runs higher, around 13.6 percent, because of those organized airline crews. The aviation segments where Brock bites hardest sit below the line: the FBOs, the contract ground handlers, the Part 135 charter operators, the regionals.

A fueler at an independent FBO has no contract forcing raises and no union to police his pay. For him, the court has always been close to the only door, and most of the time the clause kept it shut.

That is the whole reason this matters. Forced into arbitration, the nonunion worker stands alone and the case stays private, and one person's shorted overtime is hard to turn into anything bigger. Allowed into court, he can join with others, pull the payroll records, and show whether the same shorting ran across a whole station.

The strongest claims belong to the people whose hands are on the aircraft: fuelers, ramp agents, cargo and baggage handlers, Part 135 load crews. The argument thins for dispatchers and gate agents with mixed duties, and runs out at HR, finance, and the Part 141 classroom. Of the certificates, Part 135 charter carries the most exposure, because it is commercial, often interstate, and run on hourly crews and contractors.

The clearest read on what this means for aviation comes from inside aviation. Writing for the CPR Institute, Sasha Hill catalogued the briefs filed in the case, and one came from Menzies Aviation, one of the world’s largest aviation services companies, providing ground-handling support, air cargo services, fuel services, and more to passenger and commercial cargo airplanes across the United States.

Menzies told the justices, Hill reported, that its U.S. operations had already been hit by the lower courts’ "inconsistent application and expansion of the transportation worker exemption" after Saxon, and that the spread had thrown the enforceability of its own arbitration agreements into doubt.

The company asked for a hard line, one covering only workers who frequently load, unload, or move goods on vehicles that cross a border.

This was no bystander's complaint. Menzies had just lost the Lopez fueler case, so it knew firsthand what the exemption could do to it. It went to Washington to argue the rule should be narrowed, and the Court did the reverse, reading it broadly and ruling for the driver without a dissent.

The company that handles the bags and the fuel at the gate told the Supreme Court this doctrine was already costing it, and lost.

The tell is in what the operators do, not what they say. Almost none have spoken publicly, which is the smart move, since a company that advertises that its workers might escape arbitration is telling plaintiffs' lawyers where to dig.

The real work is happening in legal departments: rereading the clauses, auditing overtime, checking who is labeled a contractor, and lining up state-law arbitration as a backup, because losing under the federal act does not always end arbitration. How far this goes will depend on those state-by-state fights as much as on anything the Supreme Court said.

I want to be straight about the size of this. It is not a labor uprising, and employers would love to keep it that way. It does not hand anyone a raise, rewrite a duty-time rule, or put a union in a single shop. What it does is give a large, nonunion part of the aviation workforce a way to stand together and ask, in public, whether they were paid what they were owed.

I am sympathetic to these people, and I am curious to see how far it travels. I think about that Teterboro ramp in July, the crews turning aircraft in the heat for travelers who would not recognize them an hour later.

The whole system leans on those workers, and it pays and protects them the least.

If they are not taken care of, none of it moves.

It should not have taken a bread truck and a hundred-year-old statute for them to be seen. But it did, and now they are.

Feedback, thoughts, suggestions? Hit the reply!

Michael Wildes is the founder and CEO of Drive Phase Holding Company, home of Massif & Kroo. After leaving a career as a professional pilot, he spent a year as Business Editor at FLYING Magazine, writing 330+ articles on aviation's transformation. Now he focused on building permanent-capital companies focused on long-term trends in business, media and aviation. Based in Arlington, Virginia.

Connect: mikewildes.com

Email: [email protected]

Ready to transform artificial intelligence from a buzzword into your personal revenue generator?

HubSpot’s groundbreaking guide "200+ AI-Powered Income Ideas" is your gateway to financial innovation in the digital age.

Inside you'll discover:

Download your guide today and unlock a future where artificial intelligence powers your success. Your next income stream is waiting.

Get Your Guide